In the Book of Ruth there
is a story behind the story that is absolutely magnificent.
You may have heard that the Old Testament is the New
Testament concealed, and the New Testament is the Old
Testament revealed. I want to take a moment and look
at how the Old Testament Book of Ruth conceals the true
and faithful kinsman-redeemer that was promised to us,
the Lord Jesus Christ. We should also see how the New
Testament reveals the great truths of the Book of Ruth.
Hosea 12:10:
I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied
visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the
prophets.
A similitude shows how
one thing is like another. Parables, analogies, and
types are all examples of similitudes. In our culture
we use the term “model.” A model is a representation
of something for our insight or instruction. There are
simple two-dimensional models. There are three-dimensional
models. When you get fancy, there are also complex computer
generated simulations.
Remember how Peter talked about how the Old Testament
prophets knew of the great salvation that laid ahead
for God’s people, but couldn’t figure it
out because it was part of the mystery, which had been
hid from ages and generations.
I Peter 1:10-13:
Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched
diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should
come unto you:
Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of
Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified
beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that
should follow.
Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves,
but unto us they did minister the things, which are
now reported unto you by them that have preached the
gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven;
which things the angels desire to look into.
Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober,
and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought
unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
Ruth was part of the kethubim,
the other writings, not part of the law and prophets.
It was read yearly at Pentecost, and most scholars suggest
that was because of the association with the harvests
in the Book of Ruth. However, I would like to suggest
that it was because the Book of Ruth was prophetic of
the salvation that God would make available on the day
of Pentecost of which the Book of Ruth is prophetic.
Although Ruth relates a historical story of the
redemption of Naomi and Ruth by Boaz, (An account which
is totally, historically, accurate and true.) it also
prophetically foretells of the redemption of the Jews
and Gentiles by our kinsman-redeemer, the Lord Jesus
Christ. It does so by the use of symbolism or what some
people may call types.
Types are figures or examples of something future,
and are prophetic in nature. The value of identifying
types is not to point out intricacies of doctrine, but
to help us understand God’s sovereignty and His
work throughout history. When God had the Book of Ruth
written, He was not only thinking of Naomi, Ruth, and
Boaz, He was thinking about Jesus Christ, our kinsman-redeemer.
It was not only a wonderful story about God’s
deliverance of Naomi and Ruth by Boaz, their kinsman-redeemer.
God wanted to show us how a kinsman-redeemer acted because
Jesus Christ would ultimately do the same for us. The
presence of types is an indication that God (Who knows
the beginning from the end) is at work in history and
that He inspired the Old Testament writers to record
these typological events.
They may be used to illustrate truths of doctrine
only after those truths are clearly revealed elsewhere.
They are illustrations in as much as they agree with
the clear revelation that follows. Understanding types
helps us grasp and appreciate what God accomplished
for us in Christ.
A type may be: [From Bible note on Genesis 2:23 in the
Scofield Study Bible]
a person (Adam in
Romans 5:14);
an event (The deliverance
from Egypt in I Corinthians 10:1-11);
a thing (The veil
of the temple in Hebrews 10:19-20);
an institution (The
High Priesthood in Hebrews 9:11-12); or
a ceremonial (The Passover in I Corinthians
5:7).
Types occur most frequently
in the Pentateuch, but are found, more sparingly, elsewhere.
The antitype, or fulfillment of the type, is found generally
in the New Testament. Scofield says two warnings are
necessary: (1) nothing may be insisted upon as a type
without explicit New Testament authority; and (2) all
types not so authenticated must be recognized as having
only the authority of analogy or of spiritual congruity.
The phrase “shadow of things to come”
(Colossians 2:17 and Hebrews 8:5; 10:1) also shows the
function of these types. They foreshadow the truth they
are designed to illustrate.
For example sacrifices under the Mosaic law were
but a shadow of the greater sacrifice to come. Today
after seeing what Jesus Christ accomplished by his sacrificial
death on the cross we understand how the Old Testament
laws served as a shadow of things to come. If you stand
in the shadow of a thing and look at the thing, you
cannot see the details of it with distinction, because
there is no light to illuminate it. But if you move
to the other side of the thing and view the lighted
side which casts the shadow, the details are illuminated
and highlighted. The Old Testament laws concerning sacrifice
are like that. What was unclear in the Old Testament
as they stood in the shadow of the cross became clear
for us as we view the cross with the light of the gospel
of God's grace shining in its full brilliance upon it.
In the shadow of the cross, their understanding was
very limited. Now, we see it more clearly.
Romans 10:4 says, “Christ is the end of
the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.”
That not only means that the law ceased to function
as it did before. It ended when all was fulfilled and
the gift of holy spirit was given on Pentecost. It also
means that Christ was the end, the goal, the final target
toward which the law was aiming. The law pointed to
Christ who would ultimately fulfill it.
Major events in the Old Testament were memorialized
and communicated in feasts that foreshadowed what was
to come in the future. The Passover lamb pointed to
Christ who as our Passover was sacrificed for us. The
scapegoat pointed toward Christ who took upon himself
the sins of the world.
The law points to Christ as:
The brazen serpent
upheld in the wilderness (Numbers 21:9; John 3:14)
The manna from heaven
(Exodus 16:15; John 6:51)
The sacrifice of
the firstfruits (Exodus 34:22,26; I Corinthians 15:20,23)
The lion of Judah
(Genesis 49:9; Revelation 10:5)
The star to rise
out of Jacob (Numbers 24:17)
The scepter that
shall rise out of Israel (Numbers 24:17)
Our city of refuge
(Numbers 35)
Our daysman (Job 9:33)
Our ensign (Isaiah
11:10)
Our foundation (Isaiah
28:16; I Corinthians 3:11)
Our friend that sticks
closer than a brother (Proverbs 18:24)
Our stronghold (Nahum
1:7)
Our kinsman-redeemer
(Isaiah 59:20)
Isaiah 59:20:
And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that
turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the LORD.
Ruth paints a wonderful
word picture of our kinsman-redeemer Jesus Christ as
we saw in the first four parts of this series.
Romans 5:14:
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even
over them that had not sinned after the similitude of
Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him
that was to come.
Adam, the man, the historical
person, who lived in the Old Testament was a type of
the coming Christ. Adam’s father was God and so
was Christ’s. There are also many more ways in
which Adam was a type of Christ. Jesus is called the
last Adam in I Corinthians 15:45. Aaron, David, Eliakim,
Joseph, Melchizedek, and others were also types of Christ.
Because God knows the end from the beginning,
he can use the figure of speech type to demonstrate
His awesome magnificence. Ruth, Boaz, and Naomi were
living out a story that was much bigger than their own
lives. Yes it is a true and accurate historical account,
but God shows His sovereignty in how the story prophetically
fortells the work of our kinsman redeemer, the Lord
Jesus Christ. Is there a type of Christ in the Book
of Ruth? If you have read it, I think you know that
there is. Next week we will see who it is and look at
that symbolism in depth.